<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>PCB – 25120</title>
        <link>https://25120.org/tags/pcb/</link>
        <description>Recent posts in ‘PCB’</description>

        <language>en-gb</language>


        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:04:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>


        <atom:link href="https://25120.org/tags/pcb/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        

        <item>
            <title>A Better STM32F0 Prototyping Experience</title>
            <link>https://25120.org/post/leshy/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:04:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>https://25120.org/post/leshy/</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This project started when I was particularly annoyed by existing development board options and cheap Chinese PCB prototyping services were starting to emerge. Thus, the path forward was clear, but let’s start with the problems I was trying to solve.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I’m talking about ‘development boards’, I mean boards like the &lt;em&gt;Teensy&lt;/em&gt; models, &lt;em&gt;Feather&lt;/em&gt; variants or &lt;em&gt;blue pill&lt;/em&gt;: a PCB based laid out around a microcontroller containing very little extra circuitry; a ‘least common denominator’ of typical projects using that MCU, if you will. Evaluation boards with more interesting circuitry are great to get used to a microcontroller and its peripherals but lie beyond the scope of this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>A short reflection on direct laser PCB printing</title>
            <link>https://25120.org/post/haxmark/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 20:39:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>https://25120.org/post/haxmark/</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been using a Lexmark E360d laser printer modified for depositing toner as an etch resist directly to PCB material for a while now. Details about the build have already been available on &lt;a href=&#34;https://git.25120.org/fruchti/haxmark&#34;&gt;the project’s git repository&lt;/a&gt;, and this I’d like to focus on some comments on the actual usefulness of the project. PCB manufacture has been decreasing in its price, so I rarely use the ‘haxmark’ any more. It gets reactivated when I need a board fast and then it still does a decent job.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>PCB Etching Thermostat</title>
            <link>https://25120.org/post/pcb_etching_thermostat/</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 16:01:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>https://25120.org/post/pcb_etching_thermostat/</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A small thermostat I built for a sodium persulfate PCB etching bath, controlling a heater originally intended for fish tanks (with the original temperature control removed). The temperature is fixed to 45–50 °C and power is provided for a small air pump. Schematics can be found &lt;a href=&#34;https://25120.org/post/pcb_etching_thermostat/attachments/thermostat.pdf&#34; &gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, PCB design files and MCU firmware &lt;a href=&#34;https://25120.org/post/pcb_etching_thermostat/attachments/thermostat.zip&#34; &gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        </item>

    </channel>
</rss>

